Re: [HACKERS] logical replication - still unstable after all thesemonths

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: [HACKERS] logical replication - still unstable after all thesemonths
Дата
Msg-id ae3b727c-de41-5055-9dd9-a8c28339e0a7@2ndquadrant.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] logical replication - still unstable after all thesemonths  (Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] logical replication - still unstable after all thesemonths  (Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 6/17/17 06:48, Erik Rijkers wrote:
> On 2017-05-28 12:44, Erik Rijkers wrote:
> 
> re: srsubstate in pg_subscription_rel:
> 
>> No idea what it means.  At the very least this value 'w' is missing
>> from the documentation, which only mentions:
>>   i = initalize
>>   d = data copy
>>   s = synchronized
>>   r = (normal replication)
> 
> Shouldn't we add this to that table (51.53) in the documentation?
> 
> After all, the value 'w' does show up when you monitor 
> pg_subscription_rel.

It's not supposed to.  Have you seen it after
e3a815d2faa5be28551e71d5db44fb2c78133433?

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Marco Atzeri
Дата:
Сообщение: [HACKERS] initdb initalization failure for collation "ja_JP"
Следующее
От: Dmitry Dolgov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] type cache for concat functions