Re: [HACKERS] logical replication - still unstable after all thesemonths

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Erik Rijkers
Тема Re: [HACKERS] logical replication - still unstable after all thesemonths
Дата
Msg-id 558e658f8b6e42a68fdeaac5205a4782@xs4all.nl
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] logical replication - still unstable after all thesemonths  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 2017-06-18 00:27, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 6/17/17 06:48, Erik Rijkers wrote:
>> On 2017-05-28 12:44, Erik Rijkers wrote:
>> 
>> re: srsubstate in pg_subscription_rel:
>> 
>>> No idea what it means.  At the very least this value 'w' is missing
>>> from the documentation, which only mentions:
>>>   i = initalize
>>>   d = data copy
>>>   s = synchronized
>>>   r = (normal replication)
>> 
>> Shouldn't we add this to that table (51.53) in the documentation?
>> 
>> After all, the value 'w' does show up when you monitor
>> pg_subscription_rel.
> 
> It's not supposed to.  Have you seen it after
> e3a815d2faa5be28551e71d5db44fb2c78133433?

Ah no, I haven't seen that 'w'-value after that (and 1000s of tests ran 
without error since then).

I just hadn't realized that that w-value I had reported was indeed a 
erroneous state.

thanks, this is OK then.

Erik Rijkers




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Pavel Stehule
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] type cache for concat functions
Следующее
От: Julien Rouhaud
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Typo in planstats.sgml