Re: chained transactions
| От | Peter Eisentraut |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: chained transactions |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | adb990de-c96d-c685-ddc1-5489aaf49316@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: chained transactions (Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>) |
| Ответы |
Re: chained transactions
Re: chained transactions |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 04/11/2018 12:20, Fabien COELHO wrote: > Shouldn't psql tab completion be updated as well? Done. (I only did the AND CHAIN, not the AND NO CHAIN.) > I must admit that do not like much the three global variables & > Save/Restore functions. I'd suggest saving directly into 3 local variables > in function CommitTransactionCommand, and restoring them when needed. Code > should not be longer. I'd would not bother to skip saving when not > chaining. We're also using those functions in the 0002 patch. Should we just repeat the code three times, or use macros? > Copying & comparing nodes are updated. Should making, outing and reading > nodes also be updated? TransactionStmt isn't covered by the node serialization functions, so I didn't see anything to update. What did you have in mind? > About the tests: I'd suggest to use more options on the different tests, > eg SERIALIZABLE, READ ONLY… Also ISTM that tests should show > transaction_read_only value as well. OK, updated a bit. (Using READ ONLY doesn't work because then you can't write anything inside the transaction.) Updated patch attached. The previous (v2) patch apparently didn't apply anymore. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: