Re: Speed up COPY FROM text/CSV parsing using SIMD
| От | Nathan Bossart |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Speed up COPY FROM text/CSV parsing using SIMD |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | abHTvkeIK37hj9oS@nathan обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Speed up COPY FROM text/CSV parsing using SIMD (Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Speed up COPY FROM text/CSV parsing using SIMD
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 11, 2026 at 10:22:18PM +0300, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote: > Here is v14 which is v13-0001 + v13-0002. Thanks! It's getting close. > + /* > + * Temporary variables are used here instead of passing the actual > + * variables (especially input_buf_ptr) directly to the helper. Taking > + * the address of a local variable might force the compiler to > + * allocate it on the stack rather than in a register. Because > + * input_buf_ptr is used heavily in the hot scalar path below, keeping > + * it in a register is important for performance. > + */ > + int temp_input_buf_ptr; > + bool temp_hit_eof = hit_eof; A few notes: * Does using a temporary variable for hit_eof actually make a difference? AFAICT that's only updated when loading more data. * Does inlining the function produce the same results? * Also, I'm curious what the usual benchmarks look like with and without this hack for the latest patch. -- nathan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: