On 2023-12-15 Fr 11:06, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>> Here's more or less what I had in mind.
> Do we really need the dependency on an install tree?
> Can't we just find the executables (or .o files for Darwin)
> in the build tree? Seems like that would simplify usage,
> and reduce the possibility for version-skew errors.
>
>
Sure, I just picked up the buildfarm code more or less without any
except necessary modifications. I don't remember the history - we've
done it that way for a good long while.
We'll need a way to identify the files to analyze, e.g. different
library and exe extensions.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com