Re: pg_utility ?
| От | Christoph Berg |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pg_utility ? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | aR7gD5RZzwYwzopK@msg.df7cb.de обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: pg_utility ? (Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pg_utility ?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Re: Andreas Karlsson
> > Perhaps pg_util? ("pg" is taken by that classic pager thingy.)
>
> I like the name pg_util. In the MySQL world it is called mysqladmin, which
> is a does of pg_ctl and tools like createdb.
"pg_adm" would also be a candidate. (Or is that too close to pgadmin?)
> Maybe pg_util should only be for tools which connect to PostgreSQL over the
> TCP (or a unix socket) while the all other tools, which need access to the
> data directory, should have their own executables?
That would be the idea, yes.
Christoph
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: