Re: pg_utility ?
| От | Andreas Karlsson |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pg_utility ? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4d96e62c-fc18-4aa4-b9bd-d4e0c2fd82a3@proxel.se обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: pg_utility ? (Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pg_utility ?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/20/25 10:31 AM, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Andreas Karlsson
>>> Perhaps pg_util? ("pg" is taken by that classic pager thingy.)
>>
>> I like the name pg_util. In the MySQL world it is called mysqladmin, which
>> is a does of pg_ctl and tools like createdb.
>
> "pg_adm" would also be a candidate. (Or is that too close to pgadmin?)
Yeah, that would be way too confusing.
>> Maybe pg_util should only be for tools which connect to PostgreSQL over the
>> TCP (or a unix socket) while the all other tools, which need access to the
>> data directory, should have their own executables?
>
> That would be the idea, yes.
Then I like it!
Andreas
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: