Re: Use uppercase keywords in foreign key tutorial
| От | Bruce Momjian |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Use uppercase keywords in foreign key tutorial |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | aQKGVwVChafkfSub@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Use uppercase keywords in foreign key tutorial (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Use uppercase keywords in foreign key tutorial
|
| Список | pgsql-docs |
On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 10:24:30AM +1300, David Rowley wrote: > On Thu, 30 Oct 2025 at 09:48, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > > > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > > > On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 04:34:45PM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote: > > >> I noticed the patch also changes some column types to lowercase: > > >> ... > > >> - category_N TEXT > > >> + category_N text > > >> > > >> FWIW I tend to use uppercase for those, too, but I'm not sure there is a > > >> preferred style for the docs. > > > > > Agreed, uppercase is better for type names. > > > > "text" is not a keyword according to either us or the SQL standard. > > I agree that there's some reason to capitalize things that are > > grammar keywords, such as INTEGER or VARCHAR, but it's a big stretch > > to go from that to capitalizing everything that is a type name. > > Would you capitalize user-defined type names? > > Going by: git grep -i "\btext\b," we're fairly consistently using > lower case, so FWIW, when I looked, I thought Eric's change made > sense. > > How about if Eric just drops the portion of the patch that alters the > casing of the types and leaves all the keyword uppercasing stuff in. > Any objections to that part? Works for me. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: