On 2/14/18 03:28, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 2:15 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
>> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> I wonder how others feel about this, but the spelling of
>>> enable_partition_wise_join feels funny to me every time I look at it. I
>>> would write it enable_partitionwise_join.
>>
>> +1
>>
>> See also: https://postgr.es/m/20171005134847.shzldz2ublrb3ny2@alvherre.pgsql
>
> To that I replied with
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAFjFpRcsZnxCen88a-16R5EYqPCwFYnFThM%2Bmjagu%3DB1QvxPVA%40mail.gmail.com.
> I didn't get any further response, so nothing was changed that time.
> Alvaro, Peter, Gavin have voted for partitionwise in this thread and
> Robert had similar objections earlier. Looks like we should change it.
done
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services