On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 9:09 PM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 2/14/18 03:28, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 2:15 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
>>> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>>> I wonder how others feel about this, but the spelling of
>>>> enable_partition_wise_join feels funny to me every time I look at it. I
>>>> would write it enable_partitionwise_join.
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> See also: https://postgr.es/m/20171005134847.shzldz2ublrb3ny2@alvherre.pgsql
>>
>> To that I replied with
>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAFjFpRcsZnxCen88a-16R5EYqPCwFYnFThM%2Bmjagu%3DB1QvxPVA%40mail.gmail.com.
>> I didn't get any further response, so nothing was changed that time.
>> Alvaro, Peter, Gavin have voted for partitionwise in this thread and
>> Robert had similar objections earlier. Looks like we should change it.
>
> done
Thanks. There are functions like try_partition_wise_join(),
generate_partition_wise_join_paths() which use partition_wise
spelling. Should we update those as well?
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company