On 1/18/17 2:32 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> Unless we can find something official, I suppose we should just
> display BASE TABLE in that case as we do in other cases. I wonder if
> the schema needs some broader revision; for example, are there
> information_schema elements intended to show information about
> partitions?
Is it intentional that we show the partitions by default in \d,
pg_tables, information_schema.tables? Or should we treat those as
somewhat-hidden details?
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services