Re: pg_dump --no-comments confusion
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_dump --no-comments confusion |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Zzu6sE1OliI1Z5z5@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_dump --no-comments confusion (Marcos Pegoraro <marcos@f10.com.br>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 06:36:45PM -0300, Marcos Pegoraro wrote: > But it would be good to have this patch applied to all supported versions, as > soon as nothing was changed on that pg_dump option, no ? > > Em seg., 18 de nov. de 2024 às 18:30, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> > escreveu: > > On Tue, Nov 5, 2024 at 10:12:20AM +0100, Álvaro Herrera wrote: > > On 2024-Nov-04, Erik Wienhold wrote: > > > > > I think Bruce's suggestion is pretty clear that it does not mean line > or > > > block comments, but rather the COMMENT command. But I also think that > > > "SQL" in front of the command name is unnecessary [...] > > > > +1 for "Do not dump COMMENT commands", which is what I think you're > > saying. > > Patch applied to master. Well, I have these notes about doc changes: * inaccuracies, apply to all applicable supported versions * missing docs, master and most recent major version * unclear language or major edits, master only and it seems this patch matches the last one, which is why I only did master. Of course, these are just guidelines --- if people want me to, I can apply it to all supported braches. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com When a patient asks the doctor, "Am I going to die?", he means "Am I going to die soon?"
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: