Re: pg_dump --no-comments confusion
| От | Marcos Pegoraro |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pg_dump --no-comments confusion |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAB-JLwbzK63Vn=Dv9wSje0BsAdTXTgau5cwVZkG1ZvTBjJcabQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: pg_dump --no-comments confusion (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pg_dump --no-comments confusion
Re: pg_dump --no-comments confusion |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
But it would be good to have this patch applied to all supported versions, as soon as nothing was changed on that pg_dump option, no ?
regards
Marcos
Em seg., 18 de nov. de 2024 às 18:30, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> escreveu:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2024 at 10:12:20AM +0100, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2024-Nov-04, Erik Wienhold wrote:
>
> > I think Bruce's suggestion is pretty clear that it does not mean line or
> > block comments, but rather the COMMENT command. But I also think that
> > "SQL" in front of the command name is unnecessary [...]
>
> +1 for "Do not dump COMMENT commands", which is what I think you're
> saying.
Patch applied to master.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
When a patient asks the doctor, "Am I going to die?", he means
"Am I going to die soon?"
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: