On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 01:57:41PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> It looks to me like in the first run it took 3 minutes for the
> replay_lsn to catch up to the desired value, and in the second run,
> two seconds. I think I have seen previous instances where something
> similar happened, although in those cases I did not stop to record any
> details. Have others seen this? Is there something we can/should do
> about it?
FWIW, I've also seen delays as well with this test on a few occasions.
Thanks for mentioning it.
--
Michael