Re: IPC::Run::time[r|out] vs our TAP tests

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: IPC::Run::time[r|out] vs our TAP tests
Дата
Msg-id ZhTcgcCKKWu-pLBs@paquier.xyz
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: IPC::Run::time[r|out] vs our TAP tests  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: IPC::Run::time[r|out] vs our TAP tests
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 05:18:51PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Based on this info, I'm disinclined to put work into trying to
> make the case behave correctly with that old libedit version, or
> even to lobotomize the test case enough so it would pass.

By the way, are you planning to do something like [1]?  I've not
looked in details at the callers of IPC::Run::timeout, still the extra
debug output would be nice.

[1]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1100715.1712265845@sss.pgh.pa.us
--
Michael

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: NLS doesn't work for pg_combinebackup
Следующее
От: "Andrey M. Borodin"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: SET ROLE documentation improvement