Re: Weird test mixup

On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 06:19:38PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Do they?  It'd be fairly easy to explain this if these things were
> being run in "installcheck" style.  I'm not sure about CI, but from
> memory, the buildfarm does use installcheck for some things.
>
> I wonder if it'd be wise to adjust the injection point stuff so that
> it's active in only the specific database the injection point was
> activated in.

It can be made optional by extending InjectionPointAttach() to
specify a database OID or a database name.  Note that
041_checkpoint_at_promote.pl wants an injection point to run in the
checkpointer, where we don't have a database requirement.

Or we could just disable runningcheck because of the concurrency
requirement in this test.  The test would still be able to run, just
less times.
--
Michael