On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 06:07:13PM +0200, Christophe Courtois wrote:
> Le 21/04/2017 à 17:45, Tom Lane a écrit :
> > Christophe Courtois <christophe.courtois@dalibo.com> writes:
> >> I've found out that the example in intagg.sgml is wrongly named: the
> >> one-to-many table is a many-to-many.
> > Well, it'd depend on how it was used. The example clearly intends that
> > it be one-to-many, and I'm not sure it still makes sense without that
> > restriction. Maybe better to add a unique constraint on
> > one_to_many(left)?
>
> Perhaps the whole example can be simplified to get rid of the "left"
> table, but I didn't intend to rewrite it.
>
> >> And my colleague Thibaut Madeleine has seen that the "CREATE TABLE
> >> right" and "CREATE TABLE left" examples cannot compile due to the
> >> reserved words.
> > Ouch. Shows you how old this module is :-(
>
> Indeed.
>
> >> I propose the attached patch to fix that.
> > Um, the attached file seems empty from here.
>
> Ooops, sorry. It is attached.
I like this six year old patch so would like to apply it to master,
attached.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Only you can decide what is important to you.