Re: Requiring recovery.signal or standby.signal when recovering with a backup_label

On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 09:31:10AM -0400, David Steele wrote:
> That sounds like the right plan to me. Nice and simple.

I'll tackle that in a separate thread with a patch registered for the
upcoming CF of November.

> I'm still +1 for the patch as it stands.

I have been reviewing the patch, and applied portions of it as of
dc5bd388 and 1ffdc03c and they're quite independent pieces.  After
that, the remaining bits of the patch to change the behavior is now
straight-forward.  I have written a commit message for it, while on
it, as per the attached.
--
Michael