Re: Make SSPI documentation clearer

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: Make SSPI documentation clearer
Дата
Msg-id ZRS2Dpp4mX0plOaN@momjian.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Make SSPI documentation clearer  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Ответы Re: Make SSPI documentation clearer  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Список pgsql-docs
On Sun, Mar 12, 2023 at 08:36:53PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > When the server is on a non-Windows platform then the server must use GSSAPI
> > if it wants to authenticate the client either via Kerberos or via Active
> > Directory. A client on a Windows platform that connects to a non-Windows
> > Postgresql server can either use SSPI (strongly encouraged) or GSS (much
> > more difficult to set up) if it wants to authenticate via Kerberos or Active
> > Directory. A client from a non-Windows platform must use GSS if it wants to
> > authenticate via Kerberos or Active Directory."
> 
> Rather than work in negative, I feel like it might make more sense to
> work in positives?  That is, perhaps this instead:
> 
> On Windows platforms, SSPI is the default and most commonly used
> mechanism.  Note that an SSPI client can authenticate to a server which
> is using either SSPI or GSSAPI, and a GSSAPI client can authenticate to
> a server which is using either SSPI or GSSAPI.  Generally speaking,
> clients and servers on Windows are recommended to use SSPI while clients
> and servers on Unix (non-Windows) platforms use GSSAPI.

I developed the attached patch.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  Only you can decide what is important to you.

Вложения

В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Seeming contradiction in 22.1
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Mistake in statement example