Re: [PATCH] Honor PG_TEST_NOCLEAN for tempdirs

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: [PATCH] Honor PG_TEST_NOCLEAN for tempdirs
Дата
Msg-id ZJ5/j9AwWZGyPiGU@paquier.xyz
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PATCH] Honor PG_TEST_NOCLEAN for tempdirs  (Jacob Champion <jchampion@timescale.com>)
Ответы Re: [PATCH] Honor PG_TEST_NOCLEAN for tempdirs  (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 09:05:59AM -0700, Jacob Champion wrote:
> Sounds good -- 0002 can be ignored as needed, then. (Or I can resend a
> v3 for CI purposes, if you'd like.)

I am assuming that this is 0001 posted here:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/8be3d35a-9608-b1d5-e5e6-7a744ea45fef@timescale.com

And that looks OK to me.  This is something I'd rather backpatch down
to v11 on usability ground for developers.  Any comments or objections
about that?
--
Michael
Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: shveta malik
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Support logical replication of DDLs
Следующее
От: Jeff Davis
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pgsql: Fix search_path to a safe value during maintenance operations.