Re: [PATCH] Honor PG_TEST_NOCLEAN for tempdirs

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jacob Champion
Тема Re: [PATCH] Honor PG_TEST_NOCLEAN for tempdirs
Дата
Msg-id CAAWbhmhb1RET_KGnrVMrg2AgscOCNZeYPgDdRJ7VXx4gw6bNxw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PATCH] Honor PG_TEST_NOCLEAN for tempdirs  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Ответы Re: [PATCH] Honor PG_TEST_NOCLEAN for tempdirs  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 5:41 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> Agreed.  I am not sure that this is worth changing to have
> boolean-like checks.  Hence, I would also to keep the patch that
> checks if the environment variable is defined to enforce the behavior,
> without checking for a specific value.

Sounds good -- 0002 can be ignored as needed, then. (Or I can resend a
v3 for CI purposes, if you'd like.)

--Jacob



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: ReadRecentBuffer() doesn't scale well
Следующее
От: vignesh C
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_decode_message vs skip_empty_xacts and xact_wrote_changes