On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 05:44:28PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Changing get_altertable_subcmdtypes() to return a set of rows made of
> (subcommand, object description) is what I actually meant upthread as
> it feels natural given a CollectedCommand in input, and as
> pg_event_trigger_ddl_commands() only gives access to a set of
> CollectedCommands. This is also a test module so
> there is no issue in changing the existing function definitions.
>
> But your point would be to have a new function that takes in input a
> CollectedATSubcmd, returning back the object address or its
> description? How would you make sure that a subcommand maps to a
> correct object address?
FWIW, I was thinking about something among the lines of 0002 on top of
Hou's patch.
--
Michael