On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 09:03:23AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 09:24:56AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> I don't feel very strongly about this. It makes sense to stay consistent
>> with the existing COPY code.
>
> Yes, my previous argument is based on consistency with the
> surroundings. I am not saying that this could not be made better, it
> surely can, but I would recommend to tackle that in a separate patch,
> and apply that to more areas than this specific one.
Peter, beta2 is planned for next week. Do you think that you would be
able to address this open item by the end of this week? If not, and I
have already looked at the proposed patch, I can jump in and help.
--
Michael