Re: An obsolete comment of pg_stat_statements

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: An obsolete comment of pg_stat_statements
Дата
Msg-id YdK1ic8Pzjs2SxiU@paquier.xyz
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: An obsolete comment of pg_stat_statements  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Ответы Re: An obsolete comment of pg_stat_statements  (Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 09:02:10PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Do we really need to have this comment in the function header?  The
> same is explained a couple of lines down so this feels like a
> duplicate, and it is hard to miss it with the code shaped as-is (aka
> the relationship between compute_query_id and queryId and the
> consequences on what's stored in this case).

The simpler the better here.  So, I have just removed this comment
after thinking more about this.
--
Michael

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Remove inconsistent quotes from date_part error
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Add Boolean node