On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 12:31:47PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 8:17 AM Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>> I think for the end user, it is strictly better to name it "gzip",
>> and given that the target of this option is the end user we should
>> do so. (It'd be different it we were talking about a build-time
>> parameter to configure).
>
> I agree. Also, I think there's actually a file format called "zlib"
> which is slightly different from the "gzip" format, and you have to be
> careful not to generate the wrong one.
Okay, fine by me. It would be better to be also consistent in
WalCompressionMethods once we switch to this option value, then.
--
Michael