Re: Remove duplicate static function check_permissions in slotfuncs.c and logicalfuncs.c

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: Remove duplicate static function check_permissions in slotfuncs.c and logicalfuncs.c
Дата
Msg-id YT/5pL84LufxjSue@paquier.xyz
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Remove duplicate static function check_permissions in slotfuncs.c and logicalfuncs.c  (Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Remove duplicate static function check_permissions in slotfuncs.c and logicalfuncs.c  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 08:51:18AM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 8:07 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 12, 2021 at 10:14:36PM -0300, Euler Taveira wrote:
>>> On Sun, Sep 12, 2021, at 8:02 PM, Bossart, Nathan wrote:
>>>> nitpick: It looks like there's an extra set of parentheses around
>>>> errmsg().
>>>
>>> Indeed. Even the requirement for extra parenthesis around auxiliary function
>>> calls was removed in v12 (e3a87b4991cc2d00b7a3082abb54c5f12baedfd1).

Applied.  Not using those extra parenthesis is the most common
pattern, so tweaked this way.
--
Michael
Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com"
Дата:
Сообщение: RE: Added schema level support for publication.
Следующее
От: "houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com"
Дата:
Сообщение: RE: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side