Re: The Big 9?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Woodchuck Bill
Тема Re: The Big 9?
Дата
Msg-id Xns959B8CDD4FBB2bswr607h4@130.133.1.4
обсуждение исходный текст
Список pgsql-general
Mike Cox <mikecoxlinux@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:2va7aaF2jfll7U2@uni-berlin.de:

> Wouldn't a good solution to the "bogus" and rogue groups be a creation
> of a new domain in the big 8?  Suppose there was a rogue.* domain.
> All the groups that were rogue would be placed there by the usenet
> providers. Therefore those customers who demanded certain rogue groups
> would have them, only they would be moved under rogue.  Say someone
> sets up a rogue group like comp.muffins.  All the usenet providers
> would then just move it to rogue.comp.muffins.
>
> That way their status is clear to all subscribers, the commercial
> usnet providers would have a well managed big 9, and would not be
> forced to choose between having a well managed hierarchy or doing
> carrying the groups customers demand.

You frighten me. ;-)

--
Bill

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Woodchuck Bill
Дата:
Сообщение: List of postgresql rogue groups (was Re: Important Info on comp.databases.postgresql.general)
Следующее
От: Jim Riley
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: RFD: comp.databases.postgresql.general