Re: Setting PG-version without recompiling

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andreas Joseph Krogh
Тема Re: Setting PG-version without recompiling
Дата
Msg-id VisenaEmail.8e.793040bdcbd63e18.146fcbb2cbb@tc7-on
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Setting PG-version without recompiling  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения
På torsdag 03. juli 2014 kl. 16:16:01, skrev Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas@visena.com> writes:
> Hi. �� I'm up for testing 9.4 but my JDBC-driver fails to connect due to PG's
> minor-version string: "4beta1". Is it possible to set this somewhere without
> recompiling PG?

No, and even if you could, that would be the wrong approach.  The right
approach is to fix the JDBC driver to not complain about such version
strings.  I'm a bit surprised they haven't done so long since, considering
how long PG beta versions have been tagged like that.  For that matter,
they really ought not complain about strings like "9.5devel" or
"9.5alpha2" either.

regards, tom lane
 
I'm using the pgjdbc-ng driver, I'm sure the "official" driver handles this.
The driver will be fixed (the issue has a pull-request), I just wondered if there was a magic know I could use until the PR is merged.
 
--
Andreas Jospeh Krogh
CTO / Partner - Visena AS
Mobile: +47 909 56 963
 
Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Kevin Grittner
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: docs: additional subsection for page-level locks in explicit-locking section
Следующее
От: Tomas Vondra
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: bad estimation together with large work_mem generates terrible slow hash joins