Re: lc_numeric and negative-prefix

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andreas Joseph Krogh
Тема Re: lc_numeric and negative-prefix
Дата
Msg-id VisenaEmail.2.ca0eeb68bbbb2fc3.16d6aa6a359@tc7-visena
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: lc_numeric and negative-prefix  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-general
På torsdag 26. september 2019 kl. 00:53:28, skrev Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas@visena.com> writes:
> Can anybody shed som light
> on when negative-prefix is supposed to be respected by PG's
> formatting-functions? In lc_numeric='nb_NO.UTF-8' negative-prefix is '−'(8722),
> not '-'(45), at least in the JAVA-world, but it seems the JDBC-driver must use
> lc_numeric='C' when parsing server output. -- Andreas Joseph Krogh CTO / Partner

PG does not consider LC_NUMERIC at all when producing output from
the standard numeric data types (and we aren't going to start).
AFAIR the only functions that do pay attention to LC_NUMERIC are
to_char() and friends.

regards, tom lane
 
 
Thanks for clarifying.
 
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
CTO / Partner - Visena AS
Mobile: +47 909 56 963
 
Вложения

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: lc_numeric and negative-prefix
Следующее
От: Adrian Klaver
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: could not accept SSL connection: sslv3 alert bad certificate