Re: lc_numeric and negative-prefix

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: lc_numeric and negative-prefix
Дата
Msg-id 29374.1569452008@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на lc_numeric and negative-prefix  (Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas@visena.com>)
Ответы Re: lc_numeric and negative-prefix
Список pgsql-general
Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas@visena.com> writes:
> Can anybody shed som light
> on when negative-prefix is supposed to be respected by PG's
> formatting-functions? In lc_numeric='nb_NO.UTF-8' negative-prefix is '−'(8722),
> not '-'(45), at least in the JAVA-world, but it seems the JDBC-driver must use
> lc_numeric='C' when parsing server output. -- Andreas Joseph Krogh CTO / Partner

PG does not consider LC_NUMERIC at all when producing output from
the standard numeric data types (and we aren't going to start).
AFAIR the only functions that do pay attention to LC_NUMERIC are
to_char() and friends.

            regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andreas Joseph Krogh
Дата:
Сообщение: lc_numeric and negative-prefix
Следующее
От: Andreas Joseph Krogh
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: lc_numeric and negative-prefix