Corruption with duplicate primary key

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alex Adriaanse
Тема Corruption with duplicate primary key
Дата
Msg-id SN6PR03MB3598C0DF07CA4FB1223D5790A95C0@SN6PR03MB3598.namprd03.prod.outlook.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: Corruption with duplicate primary key  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Re: Corruption with duplicate primary key  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
We have a Postgres 10 database that we recently upgraded to Postgres 12 using pg_upgrade. We recently discovered that
thereare rows in one of the tables that have duplicate primary keys: 

record_loader=# \d loader.sync
                              Table "loader.sync"
      Column       |           Type           | Collation | Nullable | Default
-------------------+--------------------------+-----------+----------+---------
 source            | text                     |           | not null |
 natural_key       | text                     |           | not null |
 payload           | jsonb                    |           |          |
 dispatched        | timestamp with time zone |           | not null | now()
 initial_load_id   | text                     |           |          |
 deleted_load_id   | text                     |           |          |
 created_timestamp | timestamp with time zone |           |          | now()
 updated_timestamp | timestamp with time zone |           |          | now()
 deleted_timestamp | timestamp with time zone |           |          |
Indexes:
    "sync_pkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (source, natural_key)
Publications:
    "debezium"

This table is modified via triggers that fire off when a COPY command inserts many rows into another table.

Here are two example duplicate rows:

# SELECT xmin, xmax, cmin, cmax, source, md5(natural_key) AS natural_key_hash, dispatched, created_timestamp,
updated_timestamp,deleted_timestamp FROM loader.sync WHERE (source, natural_key) = ('ok_lease', '...') ORDER BY
xmin::text::int,cmin::text::int; 
-[ RECORD 1 ]-----+---------------------------------
xmin              | 116649
xmax              | 0
cmin              | 5304404
cmax              | 5304404
source            | ok_lease
natural_key_hash  | de3e9a567b90025c3399c4c63c823fe9
dispatched        | 2019-11-24 05:09:36.099686+00
created_timestamp | 2019-11-24 05:09:36.099686+00
updated_timestamp | 2019-11-24 05:09:36.099686+00
deleted_timestamp |
-[ RECORD 2 ]-----+---------------------------------
xmin              | 116649
xmax              | 118583
cmin              | 5312208
cmax              | 5312208
source            | ok_lease
natural_key_hash  | de3e9a567b90025c3399c4c63c823fe9
dispatched        | 2019-11-10 05:09:24.214964+00
created_timestamp | 2019-05-17 21:24:19.558219+00
updated_timestamp | 2019-11-24 05:09:36.099686+00
deleted_timestamp | 2019-11-24 05:09:36.099686+00

It appears that the second row was in place originally, then got updated by a trigger (and even deleted later on,
althoughit doesn't appear that the delete transaction got committed), and then the first row was inserted within the
sametransaction that updated the second row. 

Another example:
-[ RECORD 1 ]-----+---------------------------------
xmin              | 116649
xmax              | 0
cmin              | 5304403
cmax              | 5304403
source            | ok_lease
natural_key_hash  | 1c8031348701a32cb5fee26839d6b0b4
dispatched        | 2019-11-10 05:09:24.214964+00
created_timestamp | 2019-05-31 06:00:33.765547+00
updated_timestamp | 2019-11-24 05:09:36.099686+00
deleted_timestamp | 2019-11-24 05:09:36.099686+00
-[ RECORD 2 ]-----+---------------------------------
xmin              | 116649
xmax              | 0
cmin              | 5304404
cmax              | 5304404
source            | ok_lease
natural_key_hash  | 1c8031348701a32cb5fee26839d6b0b4
dispatched        | 2019-11-24 05:09:36.099686+00
created_timestamp | 2019-11-24 05:09:36.099686+00
updated_timestamp | 2019-11-24 05:09:36.099686+00
deleted_timestamp |

Both examples have in common that the two duplicate rows were touched within the same transaction.

This database runs inside Docker, with the data directory bind-mounted to a reflink-enabled XFS filesystem. The VM is
runningDebian's 4.19.16-1~bpo9+1 kernel inside an AWS EC2 instance. We have Debezium stream data from this database via
pgoutput.

Recreating the primary key confirms that the constraint doesn't (or at least shouldn't) permit these duplicate rows:

record_loader=# BEGIN;
BEGIN
record_loader=# ALTER TABLE loader.sync DROP CONSTRAINT sync_pkey;
ALTER TABLE
record_loader=# ALTER TABLE loader.sync ADD CONSTRAINT sync_pkey PRIMARY KEY (source, natural_key);
ERROR:  could not create unique index "sync_pkey"
DETAIL:  Key (source, natural_key)=(ok_lease, ...) is duplicated.
CONTEXT:  parallel worker

Any ideas on what might cause this behavior?

Thanks,

Alex


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Mark Dilger
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [Proposal] Level4 Warnings show many shadow vars
Следующее
От: Tomas Vondra
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Memory-Bounded Hash Aggregation