Re: pg_restore new option -m
От | ohp@pyrenet.fr |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_restore new option -m |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.UW2.4.63.0902201442230.27848@sun.pyrenet обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_restore new option -m (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:58:18 -0500 > From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> > To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> > Cc: ohp@pyrenet.fr, pgsql-hackers list <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org> > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_restore new option -m > > > > Tom Lane wrote: >> ohp@pyrenet.fr writes: >> >>> pg_restore -C -m 4 -d template1 db.dmp >>> gives numerous errors, mostly no such relation at index creation time. >>> >> >> You sure you don't get exactly the same without -m? >> > > > > Yeah, I have reproduced this. It's because we reconnect to the wrong db in > this case (i.e. to the -d database, not the created one) in the workers and > subsequent connects. > > I've applied a trivial patch to fix it. > works like a charm! > cheers > > andrew > > > > thanks -- Olivier PRENANT Tel: +33-5-61-50-97-00 (Work) 15, Chemin des Monges +33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax) 31190 AUTERIVE +33-6-07-63-80-64 (GSM) FRANCE Email: ohp@pyrenet.fr ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Make your life a dream, make your dream a reality. (St Exupery)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: