Re: Call for port reports
От | ohp@pyrenet.fr |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Call for port reports |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.UW2.4.53.0412181600220.6703@server.pyrenet.fr обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Call for port reports (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Prototype is #include <signal.h> int sigwait (sigset_t *set); but fe_secure.c calls sigwait(&sigpipe_sigset, &signo); so there's effectively one argument too much! reards On Fri, 17 Dec 2004, Tom Lane wrote: > Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 12:49:59 -0500 > From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> > To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> > Cc: ohp@pyrenet.fr, pgsql-hackers list <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org> > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports > > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > ohp@pyrenet.fr wrote: > >> UX:acomp: ERREUR: "fe-secure.c", ligne 1316 : prototype mismatch: 2 args passed, 1 expected: sigwait() > > > What is your prototype for sigwait()? > > Whatever it is, it doesn't agree with the Single Unix Spec: > http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007908799/xsh/sigwait.html > > On HPUX 10.20 I see > > #include <pthread.h> > > int sigwait(sigset_t *set); > > and indeed --enable-thread-safety doesn't work on this platform, > although we fail the thread safety configure test so there are other > problems beside sigwait(). > > My feeling about this is "too bad, we are not supporting threading on > platforms whose pthread.h doesn't follow SUS". > > regards, tom lane > -- Olivier PRENANT Tel: +33-5-61-50-97-00 (Work) 6, Chemin d'Harraud Turrou +33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax) 31190 AUTERIVE +33-6-07-63-80-64 (GSM) FRANCE Email: ohp@pyrenet.fr ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Make your life a dream, make your dream a reality. (St Exupery)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: