Re: was there a change in FreeBSD SHM implementation from

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Curt Sampson
Тема Re: was there a change in FreeBSD SHM implementation from
Дата
Msg-id Pine.NEB.4.44.0207120935020.436-100000@angelic.cynic.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: was there a change in FreeBSD SHM implementation from  (Vivek Khera <khera@kcilink.com>)
Ответы Re: was there a change in FreeBSD SHM implementation from  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: was there a change in FreeBSD SHM implementation from  (Vivek Khera <khera@kcilink.com>)
Список pgsql-general
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Vivek Khera wrote:

> Actually performance went down.  Way down.  I disagree with your
> argument that increasing the cache will help, since the cache is not
> needed if you don't pushd out your SHM pages in the first place and
> need to reload them quickly.

Ah, so your entire working data set can fit into your shared memory? In
that case, yes, you are better off not decreasing it. I guess we should
add a note to the FAQ for people using very small databases....

cjs
--
Curt Sampson  <cjs@cynic.net>   +81 90 7737 2974   http://www.netbsd.org
    Don't you know, in this new Dark Age, we're all light.  --XTC


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Curt Sampson
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Linux max on shared buffers?
Следующее
От: Mike Mascari
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Jan's Name (Was: Re: I am being interviewed by OReilly)