Re: Alternative cluster location
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Alternative cluster location |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.44.0311171709020.12502-100000@peter.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Alternative cluster location (<btober@seaworthysys.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Alternative cluster location
|
Список | pgsql-general |
btober@seaworthysys.com writes: > I think the original driving thought technically has something to do with > system backup, and restore or system re-install in the case of > catastrophic failure, as well as what I've alluded to in regards to > original server setup planning and how intended usage impacts decisions > with respect to hard drive partitioning (and vice versa?). I don't think > there is much under /var that I usually consider necessary to back up. Good point. Again, maybe we should just ask the FHS group about it. Personally, if I had to do a slightly more complex than average database system setup with a separate hard disk, possibly even more than one, I'd just mount them to /mnt/data{1-n} and pointed the postmaster there. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: