Tom Lane writes:
> We now have another reason to, which is Chris K-L's point about
> unqualified names in the various SQL-language built-in functions.
> I am about to commit that fix (with another catversion bump for
> good measure...)
Oh dear. We really need this function-specific schema path that the SQL
standard seems to talk about.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net