Re: So, are we going to bump catversion for beta5, or not?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: So, are we going to bump catversion for beta5, or not?
Дата
Msg-id 3944.1066752830@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: So, are we going to bump catversion for beta5, or not?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: So, are we going to bump catversion for beta5, or not?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> We try to limit initdb in late betas --- that has always been our
> process.  I don't have any problem with the initdb, though.

We now have another reason to, which is Chris K-L's point about
unqualified names in the various SQL-language built-in functions.
I am about to commit that fix (with another catversion bump for
good measure...)
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Yann Michel
Дата:
Сообщение: suspicius behaviour during delete
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: So, are we going to bump catversion for beta5, or not?