Re: 2-phase commit
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 2-phase commit |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.44.0310091615250.31740-100000@peter.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 2-phase commit (Andrew Sullivan <andrew@libertyrms.info>) |
Ответы |
Re: 2-phase commit
Re: 2-phase commit |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Sullivan writes: > Does the proposal of allowing dbas to run that risk, provided there's a > mechanism to tell them about it, satisfy the objection (assuming, of > course, 2PC can be turned off)? Why would you spent time on implementing a mechanism whose ultimate benefit is supposed to be increasing reliability and performance, when you already realize that it will have to lock up at the slightest sight of trouble? There are better mechanisms out there that you can use instead. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: