Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)
Дата
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.44.0309262225530.11938-100000@peter.localdomain
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)  ("scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>)
Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian writes:

> The argument that you want a warning because you might have mixed
> newlines in the file seems less likely than this case where they are
> using a literal carriage return as a data value at the end of the line.

I don't agree with that assessment.  Who actually has CRs in their data?

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)
Следующее
От: "scott.marlowe"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)