Matthew T. O'Connor writes:
> I think it's a question of, is this solution one that we want to keep
> for a while, or do we want a different implementation of AVD, perhaps
> something built into the backend that could take advantage of the FSM
> also.
To me it seems that this would be much better if kept inside the server.
We already have machinery for launching periodic processes that do stuff
in the data files (the checkpoint process).
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net