Re: pg_avd
От | Matthew T. O'Connor |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_avd |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1045546471.5521.42.camel@zeutrh80 обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_avd ("Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_avd
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
I think it's a question of, is this solution one that we want to keep for a while, or do we want a different implementation of AVD, perhaps something built into the backend that could take advantage of the FSM also. I would like to see it in bin, but thats just me :-) I would prefer contrib over gborg. What do people think of using pg_ctl to start and stop the AVD? Perhaps an new "with AVD" option when starting the postmaster. There are missing features still, but I will continue to work on this and fill in the gaps if people think it's worth it. On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 22:52, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > I think this is an important feature, especially for newbies, etc. I vote > for /bin. That way it will grow and improve and it will soon become a power > user feature. > > Chris > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> > To: "Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew@zeut.net> > Cc: "Patches" <pgsql-patches@postgresql.org> > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 11:25 AM > Subject: Re: [PATCHES] pg_avd > > > > > > This looks very good. It is something I have been hoping to have for > > 7.4. It does what I think everyone wanted, that is, uses the stats > > collector to determine what tables to vacuum. > > > > Just a few comments: > > > > The copyright line in the text should probably be removed. > > pg_avd seems pretty cryptic. Perhaps pg_autovacuum. > > I like the fact it is a client app. > > > > Now, where do we put it? /bin, /contrib, gborg?
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: