Re: Bug #880: COMMENT ON DATABASE depends on current database
| От | Peter Eisentraut |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Bug #880: COMMENT ON DATABASE depends on current database |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.44.0301272157280.789-100000@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Bug #880: COMMENT ON DATABASE depends on current database (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Bug #880: COMMENT ON DATABASE depends on current database
|
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
Bruce Momjian writes: > Do we have psql -l to connect to all the databases to collect comments? > I guess we could _try_ to connect to as many databases as possible, but > it seems a little overly complex to me. What do others think? I tend to think that the functionality to give comments to databases should either be redone to work right (for example by storing the comment in a global table (but think about the encoding problems)) or be ripped out. Right now the feature to give a comment to a database you presumably already know (since you connected to it) does not seem to justify the confusion it causes. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: