Re: Documentation in book length
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Documentation in book length |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.44.0301031951410.8249-100000@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Documentation in book length (Roberto Mello <rmello@cc.usu.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: Documentation in book length
|
Список | pgsql-docs |
Roberto Mello writes: > As far as my understanding of the BSD license applied to documents allows > anyone to modify said documents, saved the copyright notices are left. > However, it is very uncool to remove authorship credits from the > documentation. I don't see how removing such credits will make the Red Hat > DB documentation look any better or more "professional". It's not particularly fair, but we should discuss it. Either we consistently attribute every section or chapter, or we don't do it. I could probably put names on most chapters from memory and I wouldn't mind it, but it does seem like an unusual thing to have names on only a few sections. Maybe it would be a good compromise to record significant documentation work in the release notes with the usual attribution? -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: