Re: Documentation in book length
| От | Joe Conway |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Documentation in book length |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3E14C75A.90700@joeconway.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Documentation in book length (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Documentation in book length
Re: Documentation in book length |
| Список | pgsql-docs |
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > I know one possible objection is that it takes too long to build the > complete documentation set. But you can do an SGML syntax check that > takes a few seconds on modern machines and catches most mistakes. That sounds great. How to you do the SGML syntax check? > Compared to making the documentation easier to use and more "marketable" I > think this is a price we have to pay. > > Thoughts? Making the docs into one book should also allow better hyperlink cross-referencing. That will be a welcome improvement. Joe
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: