Re: Documentation in book length

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Documentation in book length
Дата
Msg-id 5134.1041550327@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Documentation in book length  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
Ответы Re: Documentation in book length  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: Documentation in book length  (Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>)
Re: Documentation in book length  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>)
Re: Documentation in book length  (Roberto Mello <rmello@cc.usu.edu>)
Re: Documentation in book length  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Список pgsql-docs
Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:
> Making the docs into one book should also allow better hyperlink
> cross-referencing. That will be a welcome improvement.

Yes --- eliminating our silly "it's somewhere in that part"
cross-references is quite sufficient reason in my mind to abandon the
option of building the docs in sections.  If we have to build the whole
book every time, so be it.

BTW, the Red Hat RHDB group has spent a fair amount of time rethinking
the overall organization of the docs and trying to organize 'em in a
more logical order.  They'd like to contribute that work back so they
don't have to maintain a variant version of the docs.  Is this a good
time to think about looking over what they've done?

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Joe Conway
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Documentation in book length
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Documentation in book length