Re: Documentation in book length

On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Lamar Owen wrote:

> On Thursday 02 January 2003 18:32, Tom Lane wrote:
> > BTW, the Red Hat RHDB group has spent a fair amount of time rethinking
> > the overall organization of the docs and trying to organize 'em in a
> > more logical order.  They'd like to contribute that work back so they
> > don't have to maintain a variant version of the docs.  Is this a good
> > time to think about looking over what they've done?
>
> http://sources.redhat.com/rhdb/
>
> See the links on the left under 'RHDB 2.1 Documentation'.
>
> They are quite good.

they look like our docs ... what is different?