libpqxx
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | libpqxx |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.44.0208111952180.10067-100000@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: libpqxx
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
We still haven't really decided what to do about libpqxx. The only argument I've heard so far against distributing it separately is that it would induce users to use libpq++ instead. I think having both libraries in the distribution is going to be even more confusing, especially since one is "old and well-tested" and one is brand new. The problem I see now is that libpqxx has a completely different build system and documentation system. This is also not going to help users find and use it and it's also going to be a maintenance headache. I don't necessarily want libpqxx to change it, but I feel it would be better off maintained separately. I wouldn't mind if we package libpq++ separately as well and tell users that we have these two libraries and they can pick one. And before someone suggests an --enable-libpqxx option: That's not the solution to these problems, it's only a way to hide them. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: