Thomas Lockhart writes:
> Tatsuo, it seems that we should use SQL99 terminology and commands where
> appropriate. We do not yet implement the SQL99 forms of character
> support, and I'm not sure if our current system is modeled to fit the
> SQL99 framework. Are you suggesting CREATE CONVERSION to avoid
> infringing on SQL99 syntax to allow us to use that sometime later?
SQL99 says that the method by which conversions are created is
implementation-defined. Tatsuo is defining the implementation.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net