Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: AW: More UB-Tree patent information]

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tycho Fruru
Тема Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: AW: More UB-Tree patent information]
Дата
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.44.0204102010090.7682-100000@perycles.unix.be.EU.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: AW: More UB-Tree patent information]  (Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org>)
Список pgsql-general
> Hannu Krosing wrote:
> >
> > Have you found out _what_ exaclty is patented ?
> >
> > Is it just his concrete implementation of "UB-Tree" or something
> > broader, like using one multi-dimensional index instead of multiple
> > one-dimensional ones ?

(I know it is OT, please reply in private, I can summarize any reactions
to the list ...)

Patents are supposed to be only applicable to an industrial application
(with external side-effects).  So ideas in themselves are not patentable.

Anyway, this is once more a good example of the danger of software patents
- you know what to reply when people say "software patents promote
innovation"

IANAL, just my 0,02 Euro.

see also : http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/savingeurope.html (also
interesting for non-europeans, of course !)

--
Tycho Fruru            tycho.fruru@conostix.com
"Prediction is extremely difficult. Especially about the future."
  - Niels Bohr


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Loftis
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: AW: More UB-Tree patent information]
Следующее
От: "gustavo Berns"
Дата:
Сообщение: I would preffer that postgresql start with the flag -i