Hi again Peter,
Thx for you feedback/opinion,
> It is not a wrong idea at all, but I do not think the difference between the
> performance of psql and JDBC should be significant.
My first idea was that the JDBC were the cause of low performances...
> and I found that PostgreSQL was the second best just a bit behind Interbase
Yeah, good news! This was the result as I'm aspecting!
> So my guess would be, that the observed huge performance gap between MS SQL
> and PostgreSQL can be explained either
>(1) by the specific way your Java server tier uses the JDBC connection
Could you explain me exactly what you mean?
>(2) some indexing problem
I'll check this ASAP!
THX, Auri